Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Quantum Machine Learning
Observable-Guided Generator Selection for Improving Trainability in Quantum Machine Learning with a mathfrak{g}-Purity Interpretation under Restricted Settings
arXiv
Authors: Hiroshi Ohno
Year
2026
Paper ID
52486
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
170
Citations
N/A
Abstract
To study generator design for parameterized unitaries in quantum machine learning (QML), we propose an observable-guided generator selection algorithm for n-qubit Pauli-string generator pools. The proposed method selects generators based on two criteria: maintaining large first-order sensitivity in the gradients and suppressing second-order interference in the Hessian matrix. Under a restricted setting with Pauli-string observables and candidate generators, the selection problem can be formulated as a binary optimization problem that favors mutually anti-commuting generators. Numerical experiments on a synthetic dataset with a small-scale five-qubit circuit show that the selected generators yield faster training than random generator selection in our setting, while exhibiting similar expressibility. Furthermore, under additional algebraic assumptions, the proposed criteria admit an interpretation in terms of the mathfrak{g}-purity of the observable: the first-order sensitivity is proportional to the mathfrak{g}-purity, whereas the second-order interference, namely the off-diagonal elements of the Hessian matrix, is upper-bounded by it. These results suggest that observable-guided generator selection is a promising direction for improving trainability in restricted QML settings.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- To study generator design for parameterized unitaries in quantum machine learning (QML), we propose an observable-guided generator selection algorithm for n-qubit Pauli-string...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.