Quick Navigation

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Quantum Optimization Quantum Machine Learning Quantum Simulation

Repair Before Veto, When Repair Is Hidden: Quantum-Accessible Features for Repair-Augmented Constraint Learning

arXiv
Authors: Yifan Wang

Year

2026

Paper ID

68978

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

236

Citations

0

Abstract

Hard-constraint decision systems usually veto infeasible candidates. This is too rigid when the system can act: if a known affordable repair would make an infeasible candidate feasible and valuable, rejection is a false veto rather than a ranking error. We introduce Q-RACL (Quantum Repair-Augmented Constraint Learning), a repair-before-veto framework that first defines RACL decision semantics and then identifies the single inference link where quantum feature access can be load-bearing. RACL accepts a candidate when a sequential repair plan restores feasibility and preference; otherwise it returns structured rejection credit. The hard link is repair-feasibility inference: which repair class restores feasibility from an observed candidate and context. We construct a discrete-logarithm-hidden RACL family where the repair class is a shifted interval rule in the latent exponent a = log_g(x), while the learner observes only x = g^a mod p. Under standard DLP-based learning separation, this coordinate is inaccessible to efficient raw-input classical policies but accessible to a quantum agent through Shor/Fourier structure. Across six primes and ten seeds, bounded raw-input classical policies and a wrong raw-Fourier encoding remain near chance, whereas the Q-DLP policy keeps false-veto rate below 1.1%, wins all paired seeds, and yields QNI_cond = 0.9777 to 0.9972. A classical DLog oracle matches it, isolating feature access rather than classifier capacity. Thus quantum AI is not added as a generic model upgrade; for this DLP-hidden repair family, it supplies the missing feature that closes the repair-before-veto loop.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Hard-constraint decision systems usually veto infeasible candidates.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #68978 #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi... #69034 Hardware-aware Low-latency Quan... #69027 Computational Superiority of No... #69003 QBugLM: An Agentic Benchmarking...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-19 13:58:46

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.