Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Quantum Chemistry
Simultaneous Fragment Docking for Geometrically Linkable Pose Pairs
arXiv
Authors: Jiyun Lee, You Kyoung Chung, Joonsuk Huh
Year
2026
Paper ID
69042
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
104
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Computational molecular design requires binding arrangements that are not only energetically favorable but also chemically realizable. However, computational methods remain limited in directly recovering fragment pose pairs that can later be connected into a single molecule. To address this problem, we formulated the simultaneous placement of two fragments as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problem, Q-SFD, and introduced an explicit inter-fragment distance term to favor reconstruction-feasible arrangements. Relative to the formulation without this term, Q-SFD approximately doubled top-1 recovery of reconstruction-feasible pairs, and the top-5 solutions contained at least one feasible pair for more than 90% of benchmark cases without loss of fragment-level pose accuracy.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Computational molecular design requires binding arrangements that are not only energetically favorable but also chemically realizable.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.