Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Quantum Machine Learning
Finding the optimal Nash equilibrium in a discrete Rosenthal congestion game using the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz
arXiv
Authors: Mark Hodson, Brendan Ruck, Hugh Ong, Stefan Dulman, David Garvin
Year
2020
Paper ID
21339
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
133
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This paper establishes the tractability of finding the optimal Nash equilibrium, as well as the optimal social solution, to a discrete congestion game using a gate-model quantum computer. The game is of the type originally posited by Rosenthal in the 1970's. To find the optimal Nash equilibrium, we formulate an optimization problem encoding based on potential functions and path selection constraints, and solve it using the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz. We compare this formulation to its predecessor, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm. We implement our solution on an idealized simulator of a gate-model quantum computer, and demonstrate tractability on a small two-player game. This work provides the basis for future endeavors to apply quantum approximate optimization to quantum machine learning problems, such as the efficient training of generative adversarial networks using potential functions.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This paper establishes the tractability of finding the optimal Nash equilibrium, as well as the optimal social solution, to a discrete congestion game using a gate-model...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.