Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation

Quantum and Classical Dynamics of a BEC in a Large-Period Optical Lattice

arXiv
Authors: J. H. Huckans, I. B. Spielman, B. Laburthe Tolra, W. D. Phillips, J. V. Porto

Year

2009

Paper ID

9307

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

80

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We experimentally investigate diffraction of a Rb-87 Bose-Einstein condensate from a 1D optical lattice. We use a range of lattice periods and timescales, including those beyond the Raman-Nath limit. We compare the results to quantum mechanical and classical simulations, with quantitative and qualitative agreement, respectively. The classical simulation predicts that the envelope of the time-evolving diffraction pattern is shaped by caustics: singularities in the phase space density of classical trajectories. This behavior becomes increasingly clear as the lattice period grows.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2009 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We experimentally investigate diffraction of a Rb-87 Bose-Einstein condensate from a 1D optical lattice.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #9307 #69599 Tensor network compression usin... #69594 A Collective-Spin Derivation of... #69593 Local correlations in long-rang... #69592 Direct/adaptive-mixture phase-g...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.