Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation

Relativistic Coulomb Integrals and Zeilberger's Holonomic Systems Approach. I

arXiv
Authors: Peter Paule, Sergei K. Suslov

Year

2012

Paper ID

8683

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

83

Citations

N/A

Abstract

With the help of computer algebra we study the diagonal matrix elements <Or^p>, where O are the standard Dirac matrix operators and the angular brackets denote the quantum-mechanical average for the relativistic Coulomb problem. Using Zeilberger's extension of Gosper's algorithm and a variant to it, three-term recurrence relations for each of these expectation values are derived together with some transformation formulas for the corresponding generalized hypergeometric series. In addition, the virial recurrence relations for these integrals are also found and proved algorithmically.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2012 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • With the help of computer algebra we study the diagonal matrix elements , where O are the standard Dirac matrix operators and the angular brackets denote the quantum-mechanical...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #8683 #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78810 Secure Quantum Handshakes: Quan... #78802 Quantum Co-Design of Inhomogene... #78801 Constructing Large and Structur...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.