Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
A q-difference Baxter's operator for the Ablowitz-Ladik chain
arXiv
Authors: Federico Zullo
Year
2015
Paper ID
7923
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
114
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We construct the Baxter's operator and the corresponding Baxter's equation for a quantum version of the Ablowitz Ladik model. The result is achieved by looking at the quantum analogue of the classical Backlund transformations. For comparison we find the same result by using the well-known Bethe ansatz technique. General results about integrable models governed by the same r-matrix algebra will be given. The Baxter's equation comes out to be a q-difference equation involving both the trace and the quantum determinant of the monodromy matrix. The spectrality property of the classical Backlund transformations gives a trace formula representing the classical analogue of the Baxter's equation. An explicit q-integral representation of the Baxter's operator is discussed.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We construct the Baxter's operator and the corresponding Baxter's equation for a quantum version of the Ablowitz Ladik model.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.