Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Secure Non-Interactive Reductions
arXiv
Authors: Maxwell Gold, Sarah Hagen, Daniel Alabi, Eric Chitambar
Year
2026
Paper ID
78624
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
166
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Efficient models for secure computation often rely on offline preprocessed correlations, which subsequently enable private online computation from minimal assumptions. Within these models, the study of secure non-interactive reductions (SNIR) formalizes when one classical correlation can be non-interactively transformed into another, while guaranteeing information-theoretic simulation-based privacy. In this work, we introduce quantum secure non-interactive reductions (QSNIR), a natural extension of SNIR, in which the source and target resource are each a bipartite quantum state. Specifically, when the target resource is classical, our framework enables us to analyze the problem of disseminating private correlations from entanglement, in addition to classical resources. Our primary technical result is that QSNIR privacy in this context can be computed exactly via a semidefinite program (SDP) pair that quantifies an error operationally rooted in a simulation-based cheating advantage. We prove that QSNIR privacy is lower-bounded by a decision problem related to minimum-error state discrimination (MED), and use both definitions to compute exact one-shot privacy errors for universal two-party computation (2PC) preprocessing correlations.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Efficient models for secure computation often rely on offline preprocessed correlations, which subsequently enable private online computation from minimal assumptions.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.