Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum entanglement between gauge boson pairs at a muon collider
Crossref
Authors: Ran Ding, Alim Ruzi, Sitian Qian, Andrew Michael Levin, Youpeng Wu, Qiang Li
Year
2026
Paper ID
77628
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
113
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Abstract Quantum entanglement is one of the significant physics phenomena that can be examined in high energy collision . A muon collider can provide a stage on which we can study substantial physics phenomenon, starting from the precision measurements of the Standard Model and beyond to the undiscovered area of physics. In this work, we present a through study of quantum entanglement in µ + µ -→ ZZ events at a future muon collider. By fixing the spin density matrix, observables quantifying entanglement between Z boson pairs can be measured. After systematic Monte-Carlo simulation and background analysis, we measure the value of entanglement variables and finally observed the entanglement of the ZZ system up to 2 significance level.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Abstract Quantum entanglement is one of the significant physics phenomena that can be examined in high energy collision .
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.