Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Thermodynamics
Quantum Chemistry
Size-extensive auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo with perturbative coupled cluster trial wavefunctions
Crossref
Authors: Yichi Zhang, Ankit Mahajan, Yann Damour, Sandeep Sharma
Year
2026
Paper ID
77295
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
135
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this work, we develop a size-extensive Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC) approach that scales as O(N5) for local energy evaluation by perturbatively treating the Coupled Cluster Singles and Doubles (CCSD) trial wavefunctions. Comprehensive numerical examinations, spanning from main-group molecules to 3d transition metal complexes, demonstrate that this perturbative treatment introduces negligible bias. For small systems, our method achieves an accuracy and level of noise comparable to AFQMC with configuration interaction singles and doubles trial wavefunctions while outperforming CCSD(T). This size extensivity offers a decisive advantage for large systems, as suggested by the ground state energies of non-interacting monomers and one-dimensional atomic chains. Finally, the numerical simulations of the uniform electron gas provide evidence that, unlike the CCSD(T) method, our new approach does not suffer from infrared divergence in the thermodynamic limit.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this work, we develop a size-extensive Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC) approach that scales as O(N5) for local energy evaluation by perturbatively treating the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.