Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Chemistry
Analytic evaluation of Coulomb integrals for one, two and three-electron distance operators, RC1-nRD1-m, RC1-nr12-m and r12-nr13-m with n, m=0,1,2
arXiv
Authors: Sandor Kristyan
Year
2017
Paper ID
7700
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
145
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The state of the art for integral evaluation is that analytical solutions to integrals are far more useful than numerical solutions. We evaluate certain integrals analytically that are necessary in some approaches in quantum chemistry. In the title, where R stands for nucleus-electron and r for electron-electron distances, the (n,m)=(0,0) case is trivial, the (n,m)=(1,0) and (0,1) cases are well known, fundamental milestone in integration and widely used in computation chemistry, as well as based on Laplace transformation with integrand exp-$a2t2$. The rest of the cases are new and need the other Laplace transformation with integrand exp-$a2t$ also, as well as the necessity of a two dimensional version of Boys function comes up in case. These analytic expressions (up to Gaussian function integrand) are useful for manipulation with higher moments of inter-electronic distances, for example in correlation calculations.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The state of the art for integral evaluation is that analytical solutions to integrals are far more useful than numerical solutions.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.