Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
The Pauli Lightcone: Information-Theoretic Error Mitigation Beyond the Autocorrelation
arXiv
Authors: Paolo D'Alberto
Year
2026
Paper ID
76358
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
161
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We introduce the wavemap: a spatial portrait of noise effects that assigns each site a per-noise-level arrival delay l_γ(v) and cross-entropy loss L_γ(v). These observables are exact at the lightcone frontier, where bond dimension χis small and the simulation is most faithful. Eigenvalue analysis of the composed gate-plus-noise Pauli transfer matrices confirms that the studied noise is pure amplitude damping: the spatial propagation pattern is entirely determined by the gate, making the wavemap a model-free noise diagnostic. We apply the multi-product formula (MPF) to recover the noiseless Pauli weight field from the noisy samples, subject to the Lieb-Robinson causal constraint nMPF <= nnl . Fitting time-adaptive coefficients α(t) over the frontier recovers up to 55% of the information loss relative to the best noisy sample, exploiting the fact that the frontier is where truncation error is smallest. On an IBM heavy-hex lattice with heterogeneous hardware noise the method identifies an information-starved regime, pointing to calibrated synthetic noise as the next required experiment.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We introduce the wavemap: a spatial portrait of noise effects that assigns each site a per-noise-level arrival delay l_γ(v) and cross-entropy loss L_γ(v).
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.