Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Quantum Simulation
Low-leakage superconducting-qubit measurement with sub-100-ns total duration
arXiv
Authors: Peter A. Spring, Adrian L. Hesse, Shiyu Wang, Shuhei Tamate, Yasunobu Nakamura
Year
2026
Paper ID
76351
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
195
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Fast, accurate, and low-leakage qubit measurement is a key requirement for quantum error correction. Here, we demonstrate measurement of a superconducting transmon qubit with a total duration of 97(1) ns, defined as the time from the start of the measurement pulse until the measurement-induced error on a subsequent π-pulse operation falls below 10-4. By combining a large state-averaged resonator decay rate of κeff/2π = 30.8 MHz with a dispersive shift close to the optimal SNR-per-photon condition, we achieve an assignment error of 0.17(1)% using a 58-ns measurement pulse, with residual readout photons depleting passively in tens of nanoseconds without an active depletion pulse. Using a repeated-measurement sequence together with a leakage-sensitive measurement, we benchmark the measurement-induced state transitions, finding a per-measurement leakage rate of 2.7(2) times 10-5, only twice the background rate and two orders of magnitude below the measurement-induced relaxation rate, which dominates the assignment error. Floquet simulations indicate that the multiphoton resonances present at the operating point are weakly coupled and traversed diabatically, without causing leakage. These results demonstrate that a large resonator decay rate, combined with a dispersive shift close to the optimal SNR-per-photon condition, can enable fast, high-fidelity, low-leakage dispersive readout at small qubit-resonator detuning.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Fast, accurate, and low-leakage qubit measurement is a key requirement for quantum error correction.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.