Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Auditing Structured Randomness for Quantum Error Correction under a Bounded Cloud Fault Model
arXiv
Authors: Ziqing Guo, Anthony Lawrence, Renyu Wang, Randy Kuang, Ziwen Pan
Year
2026
Paper ID
76291
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
172
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Cloud quantum processors compile submitted quantum error correction circuits and may colocate them with untrusted workloads. A fixed public encoder gives a fault-injection adversary a reusable target. Per-run reseeding changes the physical-to-logical fault map. Exact Haar-random encoders have exponential circuit cost. Efficient random ensembles provide average-moment guarantees and leave worst-case accepted corruption uncharacterized. We define accepted logical disturbance, an acceptance-weighted measure of harmful logical action in accepted results, and derive its exact Haar expectation. We evaluate a polynomial-cost seeded Clifford encoder family using dense linear algebra and gate-level stabilizer simulation against faults chosen before or after the encoder is known. Reseeding reduces mean accepted logical disturbance from 0.150 for faults chosen after learning each encoder to 0.020 for one fault chosen before it is known. The 86.7% reduction results from rejection. The fixed distance-three [[5,1,3]] code corrects every tested weight-one Pauli, while 18.5% of sampled encoders in the selected ensemble satisfy exact quantum error correction. The measured reduction quantifies the integrity gain from reseeding and separates postselected detection from exact correction under explicit fault and attacker-knowledge models.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Cloud quantum processors compile submitted quantum error correction circuits and may colocate them with untrusted workloads.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.