Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantifying the Dual-isotope Advantage for Ytterbium-array Surface Codes using Realistic Noise Models
arXiv
Authors: Fumiyoshi Kobayashi, Toshi Kusano, Nicholas Fazio, Yuma Nakamura
Year
2026
Paper ID
76232
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
164
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Neutral-atom quantum computers are a promising platform for fault-tolerant quantum computation, but logical performance depends on systemic realistic noise factors during syndrome extraction. In dual-isotope Yb arrays, the roles of data and ancilla qubits are separated spectrally, allowing ancilla qubits to be measured in place without additional transport or shelving operations. Here we quantify the advantage of a dual-isotope Yb architecture for surface code memories. We develop an experimentally motivated Clifford-compatible noise model for dual-isotope 171Yb-174Yb systems using generalised Pauli twirling and implement it as a wrapper for Stim called DualYbSim, which has been packaged as an open source Python library. Simulations of rotated and XZZX surface codes show that a dual-isotope architecture with in-place measurement achieves the lowest logical error rates among the architectures considered, outperforming single-isotope schemes based on shelving or zoned measurement. Our error-budget analysis also identifies Rydberg-state decay as the dominant limitation, contributing to 74-80% of the logical error rate scaling, highlighting concrete experimental targets for improving FTQC performance.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Neutral-atom quantum computers are a promising platform for fault-tolerant quantum computation, but logical performance depends on systemic realistic noise factors during...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.