Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Rapid Charge Stability Diagram Generation from Device-level Modeling of Semiconductor Quantum Dots
arXiv
Authors: Ron Nodel, David W. Kanaar, Connor Nasseraddin, Tim J. Wilson, Hong-Wen Jiang, Jason R. Petta, Chris Anderson, Mark F. Gyure
Year
2026
Paper ID
76198
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
171
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Self-consistent Schrödinger-Poisson calculations are a powerful tool for predicting the behavior of layered semiconductor quantum dot devices. However, characterization of charge stability diagrams through fully simulated gate-voltage sweeps is computationally expensive. Combining a Multi-Domain Multi-Model (MDMM) approach with an automated tuning routine, we identify gate voltages associated with selected charge configurations. This small set of self-consistent simulations can be augmented with Full Configuration Interaction (FCI) energy calculations to extract charging energies, lever arms, and interdot Coulomb interactions to directly parameterize a Hubbard model for rapid charge stability diagram generation. For an Intel Tunnel Falls Si/SiGe device, we demonstrate the Hubbard model's ability to reproduce charge stability diagrams at a fraction of the computational cost in comparison to voltage bias sweeps. We further compare the simulated diagrams to experimental data and demonstrate qualitative agreement. Our result represents a step towards predictive digital twin models for semiconductor quantum dot devices. Finally, we apply this workflow towards lever arm engineering in a second device, demonstrating that the method extends to multiple architectures.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Self-consistent Schrödinger-Poisson calculations are a powerful tool for predicting the behavior of layered semiconductor quantum dot devices.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.