Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Variationally Optimized Imaginary-time Polynomial Filters for Ground State Projection
arXiv
Authors: Bahman Seifi, Ibsal Assi, J. P. F. LeBlanc
Year
2026
Paper ID
76196
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
143
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this work, we develop a variational imaginary-time evolution (ITE) framework based on polynomial filtering, derived from an operator-level action principle, which yields an optimized non-unitary projector expressed as a polynomial in the Hamiltonian. Starting from a single-ancilla, first-order imaginary-time update defined by a Taylor expansion and Trotter-Suzuki (TS) decompositions, we show that replacing these approximations with alternative variational formulas substantially improves both accuracy and stability at larger time steps, leading to up to an order-of-magnitude enhancement in the final success probability. We further derive rigorous error bounds that depend only on static properties of the Hamiltonian, providing practical guidance for selecting the simulation time step. Benchmarks on the transverse-field Ising model demonstrate faster convergence to the ground-state energy and improved robustness compared to standard TS--Taylor ITE, highlighting variational polynomial filtering as a practical route to higher-fidelity ground-state preparation on near-term quantum devices.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this work, we develop a variational imaginary-time evolution (ITE) framework based on polynomial filtering, derived from an operator-level action principle, which yields an...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.