Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Robust two-qubit gates in silicon double quantum dots with composite pulses and optimized exchange control
Crossref
Authors: Rui Yu, Haoxuan Chen, Chenyi He, Fang Gao, Chengxian Zhang
Year
2026
Paper ID
76021
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
175
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Abstract Robust two-qubit gates are essential for scalable silicon spin qubits, but their fidelities are limited by microwave-control imperfections and charge-noise-induced exchange fluctuations. We propose a practical scheme for robust controlled-Z (CZ) and controlled-NOT (CNOT) gates in a silicon double quantum dot. By applying a transverse microwave drive, the effective Hamiltonian can be decomposed into two driven subspaces. In the subspace mainly controlled by the microwave field, a Broadband 1 (BB1) composite pulse is used to suppress errors in the microwave amplitude. In the exchange-assisted subspace, the microwave phases and durations are kept fixed, while a few piecewise-constant exchange amplitudes are optimized by a GRAPE-like procedure. This design reduces the sensitivity to both microwave-amplitude and exchange-amplitude errors while keeping the control waveform simple and experimentally friendly. Numerical simulations show that the optimized CNOT gate reaches a fidelity above 99.99% under experimentally relevant noise strengths, and the CZ gate also maintains a fidelity above 99.9%. These results indicate that combining composite pulses with optimized exchange control provides an experimentally feasible route to robust two-qubit gates in silicon spin qubits.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Abstract Robust two-qubit gates are essential for scalable silicon spin qubits, but their fidelities are limited by microwave-control imperfections and charge-noise-induced...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.