Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Energy Gap of Quantum Spin Glasses: A Projection Quantum Monte Carlo Study.
PubMed
Authors: Brodoloni L, Astrakharchik GE, Giorgini S, Pilati S
Year
2026
Paper ID
75924
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
186
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The performance of quantum annealing for combinatorial optimization is fundamentally limited by the minimum energy gap Δ encountered at quantum phase transitions. We investigate the scaling of Δ with system size N for two paradigmatic quantum spin-glass models: the two-dimensional Edwards-Anderson (2D-EA) and the all-to-all Sherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) models. Utilizing a newly proposed unbiased energy-gap estimator for continuous-time projection quantum Monte Carlo simulations, complemented by high-performance sparse eigenvalue solvers, we characterize the gap distributions across disorder realizations. It is found that, in the 2D-EA case, the inverse-gap distribution develops a fat tail with infinite variance as N increases. This indicates that the unfavorable superalgebraic scaling of Δ, recently reported for binary couplings [M. Bernaschi et al., The quantum transition of the two-dimensional Ising spin glass, Nature (London) 631, 749 (2024)NATUAS0028-083610.1038/s41586-024-07647-y], persists for the Gaussian disorder considered here, pointing to a universal feature of 2D spin glasses. Conversely, the SK model retains a finite-variance distribution, with the disorder-averaged gap following a rather slow power law, close to Δ∝N^{-1/3}. This finding provides a promising outlook for the potential efficiency of quantum annealers for optimization problems with dense connectivity.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The performance of quantum annealing for combinatorial optimization is fundamentally limited by the minimum energy gap Δ encountered at quantum phase transitions.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.