Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Expected Optimal Time for the NMR Implementation of Shor's Algorithm for Factorising 15
arXiv
Authors: Vlad Cărare, Alejandro Cros Carrillo de Albornoz, John Taylor
Year
2018
Paper ID
7405
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
128
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this paper, we briefly discuss the methodology for simulating a quantum computer which performs Shor's algorithm on a 7-qubit system to factorise 15. Using this simulation and the overlooked quantum brachistochrone method, we devised a Monte Carlo algorithm to calculate the expected time a theoretical quantum computer could perform this calculation under the same energy conditions as current working quantum computers. We found that, experimentally, a nuclear magnetic resonance quantum computer would take 1.59 pm 0.04 s to perform our simulated computation, whereas the expected optimal time under the same energy conditions is 0.955 pm 0.004 ms. Moreover, we found that the expected time is inversely proportional to the energy variance of our qubit states (as expected). Finally, we propose this theoretical method for analysing the time-efficiency of future quantum computing experiments.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this paper, we briefly discuss the methodology for simulating a quantum computer which performs Shor's algorithm on a 7-qubit system to factorise 15.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.