Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Foundations
The Complexity of Dynamical Correlators: Operator Shadows and Exponential Learning Separations
arXiv
Authors: Shao-Hen Chiew, Armando Angrisani, Zoe Holmes
Year
2026
Paper ID
73554
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
142
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum platforms can realize many-body dynamics beyond classical simulation yet complete readout remains intractable: the cost of extracting accessible information scales exponentially with system size. Classical shadows and Bell sampling offer scalable, multi-observable estimation from randomized or entanglement-assisted measurements. Here we aim to push these ideas beyond static snapshots to dynamical correlators, including out-of-time-ordered correlators (OTOCs) and two-point functions. In particular, we introduce the notion of the shadow of an operator, defined as the classical shadow of the vectorized time-evolved operator. Pauli operator-shadows enable simultaneous estimation of all local OTOCs, while Clifford operator-shadows enable efficient simultaneous estimation of all two-point correlators. Alternatively, Bell sampling allows one to simultaneously compute all diagonal OTOCs. We also prove information-theoretic lower bounds for learning OTOCs, fully characterizing their query complexities in many cases, and yielding exponential separations that formalize when the vectorized approach provides measurement-efficiency advantages.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum platforms can realize many-body dynamics beyond classical simulation yet complete readout remains intractable: the cost of extracting accessible information scales...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.