Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Entropy Information Measures
Probability Measures and projections on Quantum Logics
arXiv
Authors: Oľga Nánásiová, Ľubica Valášková, Viera Čerňanová
Year
2018
Paper ID
7347
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
113
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The present paper is devoted to modelling of a probability measure of logical connectives on a quantum logic (QL), via a G-map, which is a special map on it. We follow the work in which the probability of logical conjunction, disjunction and symmetric difference and their negations for non-compatible propositions are studied. We study such a G-map on quantum logics, which is a probability measure of a projection and show, that unlike classical (Boolean) logic, probability measure of projections on a quantum logic are not necessarilly pure projections. We compare properties of a G-map on QLs with properties of a probability measure related to logical connectives on a Boolean algebra.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The present paper is devoted to modelling of a probability measure of logical connectives on a quantum logic (QL), via a G-map, which is a special map on it.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.