Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Gaussian Reformulation of the Feynman Path Integral for Quantum Statistical Mechanics with Results for the Second Virial Coefficient of 4He
arXiv
Authors: Phil Attard
Year
2026
Paper ID
73571
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
90
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The Feynman path integral for quantum statistical mechanics is reformulated as Gaussian sampling of the neighborhood of each position configuration. The variance and mean are obtained from ring polymer statistics on a lattice, and from the high temperature expansion of the Wigner-Kirkwood commutation function, respectively. The algorithm avoids multiple temperature nodes for each configuration and the need for numerical cancelation in the statistical averages, which are problematic for conventional path integral quantum Monte Carlo. Analytic and simulation results for the second virial coefficient of helium are compared to laboratory measurements.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The Feynman path integral for quantum statistical mechanics is reformulated as Gaussian sampling of the neighborhood of each position configuration.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.