Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Fast state tomography with optimal error bounds
arXiv
Authors: Madalin Guta, Jonas Kahn, Richard Kueng, Joel A. Tropp
Year
2018
Paper ID
7314
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
144
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Projected least squares (PLS) is an intuitive and numerically cheap technique for quantum state tomography. The method first computes the least-squares estimator (or a linear inversion estimator) and then projects the initial estimate onto the space of states. The main result of this paper equips this point estimator with a rigorous, non-asymptotic confidence region expressed in terms of the trace distance. The analysis holds for a variety of measurements, including 2-designs and Pauli measurements. The sample complexity of the estimator is comparable to the strongest convergence guarantees available in the literature and - in the case of measuring the uniform POVM - saturates fundamental lower bounds.The results are derived by reinterpreting the least-squares estimator as a sum of random matrices and applying a matrix-valued concentration inequality. The theory is supported by numerical simulations for mutually unbiased bases, Pauli observables, and Pauli basis measurements.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Projected least squares (PLS) is an intuitive and numerically cheap technique for quantum state tomography.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.