Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Covariant Approximate Quantum Codes for Protected Analog Computation
arXiv
Authors: Mariia Elovenkova, Hong-Ye Hu, Susanne F. Yelin
Year
2026
Paper ID
72231
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
150
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum error correction compatible with continuous symmetries is a fundamental problem in quantum information and a possible route to robust analog quantum simulation. Because the Eastin-Knill theorem forbids exact codes with continuous transversal symmetries, we construct explicit SU(d)-covariant approximate codes that exploit permutation symmetry to spread logical information uniformly across all physical subsystems. For one-, two-, and three-qudit erasures at known locations, we prove worst-case purified-distance scaling Θ(1/N), matching approximate Eastin-Knill lower bounds up to constants, and we extend the reduced-state analysis to general flagged local noise. For single-qudit erasure, we construct an explicit near-optimal decoder from the Petz recovery map. We then use these codes as building blocks for encoded analog dynamics. Symmetry-preserving Hamiltonians generate block-structured dynamical Lie algebras implementable transversally, while controlled symmetry-breaking terms serve as non-transversal resources for universal dynamics. These results provide explicit non-Abelian covariant codes and a framework for robust analog quantum simulation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum error correction compatible with continuous symmetries is a fundamental problem in quantum information and a possible route to robust analog quantum simulation.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.