Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Thermodynamics
From Intermediate Epoxy Group to Stable Ether Bridge: Insights from DFT Study on Graphene Quantum Dots
Crossref
Authors: Dmitry Romanov, Anatoly Lavrentyev, Igor Ershov
Year
2026
Paper ID
71668
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
177
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This study investigates the mechanism of ether bridge formation on the edges of graphene quantum dots (GQDs) and evaluates its impact on their structural, electronic, and optical properties. Using density functional theory (DFT) coupled with Clar’s aromatic sextet rule, we analyzed different edge functionalization sites on a model nanographene. The kinetic parameters evaluated via the Eyring–Polanyi equation demonstrate that the stability of functional groups is fundamentally governed by the retention or migration of aromatic sextets. While epoxidation at thermodynamically favorable edge sites that form stable epoxy intermediates exhibits high kinetic stability with substantial activation barriers, alternative configurations directly relax during geometry optimization to minimize aromaticity disruption. Moreover, highly metastable epoxy intermediates convert to ether bridges via nearly barrierless pathways at ambient temperature. Simplified time-dependent DFT (sTD-DFT) calculations show that oxygen functionalization narrows the energy gap, yielding a distinct bathochromic shift into the visible range. Ultimately, Clar’s rule is established as a predictive tool for ether bridge formation, enabling the rational design of GQDs with tailored stability and optical properties for bioimaging and optoelectronic applications.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This study investigates the mechanism of ether bridge formation on the edges of graphene quantum dots (GQDs) and evaluates its impact on their structural, electronic, and...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.