Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Thermodynamics
Comment on Statistical mechanics from quantum envariance and exchange symmetry
arXiv
Authors: Ridha Horchani
Year
2026
Paper ID
73044
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
192
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Ojha, Sardana, and Ghosh [Phys. Rev. A 113, 042221 (2026)] propose that tracing environmental records of particle permutations produces an entropy kB ln N!, thereby explaining the Gibbs factor, and use the same construction to multiply the Saha equilibrium relation by 1/(Ne!Np!). We show that these conclusions do not follow. The reduced density matrix printed in their Eq. (32) is not a partial trace, and even under the natural corrected interpretation the entropy equals kB ln N! only when the system branch states are mutually orthogonal. That condition is not generally satisfied and, when imposed on labeled permutation branches, does not by itself restrict the particle state to one bosonic or fermionic symmetry sector. A two-particle calculation makes the contradiction explicit. Their Gibbs-paradox calculation also starts from a distinguishable-particle entropy while calling it the Sackur-Tetrode entropy. In the Saha section, the state in Eq. (52), as written, factorizes and has zero system-environment entanglement. The proposed factorial does not approach unity in the claimed dilute-gas limit, does not yield a finite nonzero intensive thermodynamic limit, and counts indistinguishability twice. We give the corrected canonical and fugacity-based formulations and identify which standard results of the paper remain unaffected.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Ojha, Sardana, and Ghosh [Phys.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.