Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Ciclo de vida de desarrollo de software cuántico estructurado (QSDLC) para la computación de próxima generación
Crossref
Authors: Fabián Lizardo Caicedo Goyes
Year
2026
Paper ID
71241
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
132
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum computing promises exponential advantages over classical paradigms; however, it still lacks standardized software engineering methodologies. This paper proposes a Structured Quantum Software Development Life Cycle (QSDLC) that adapts and extends traditional practices, such as analysis, design, development, testing, and maintenance, to the quantum domain. The proposed QSDLC incorporates specific phases, including probabilistic validation, noise mitigation, and hybrid simulation. For validation purposes, the model was applied to a case study on the optimization of hybrid logistics networks by implementing representative algorithms, Grover and QAOA, in the Qiskit and Cirq environments. The results show improvements of up to 84% in execution time and a 42% reduction in resource usage compared to classical methods. The QSDLC constitutes a reproducible framework for accelerating the adoption of quantum software in applications such as optimization, cryptography, and scientific simulation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum computing promises exponential advantages over classical paradigms; however, it still lacks standardized software engineering methodologies.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.