Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Multi-Party Threshold Private Set Intersection with Explicit Cardinality Testing
arXiv
Authors: Zixian Gong, Kun Tian, Yi Zhang, Fengxia Liu
Year
2026
Paper ID
70580
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
166
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Threshold private set intersection (TPSI) allows parties to reveal their intersection only when its cardinality reaches a prescribed threshold. Existing quantum TPSI protocols typically rely on a third party (TP) to interpret the final results, which deviates from the cardinality-testing paradigm of TPSI. In this paper, we propose a quantum multiparty TPSI protocol with explicit cardinality testing. Our protocol develops a rotation-based quantum construction in which single-photon sequences are sequentially processed through participant-side data rotations, TP--participant masking rotations, and correlated aggregate rotations. This design produces hidden-label measurement vectors: TP can complete the final measurement, but cannot interpret the semantic meaning of the outcomes. Based on these hidden measurements, we further realize the threshold decision through an oblivious linear evaluation (OLE)-based inner product procedure and a lightweight garbled circuit, revealing only mathbf 1\[|bigcapi Xi|ge τ\] before conditional intersection reconstruction. We prove the correctness and security of the proposed protocol, and further validate its feasibility through quantum-circuit simulations implemented on the IBM \textsf{Qiskit} platform.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Threshold private set intersection (TPSI) allows parties to reveal their intersection only when its cardinality reaches a prescribed threshold.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.