Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Bell inequalities tailored to optimal global randomness certification
arXiv
Authors: Ignacio Perito, Raffaele D'Avino, Michał Jung, Piotr Mironowicz, Antonio Acín, Remigiusz Augusiak
Year
2026
Paper ID
69953
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
145
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present two novel families of bipartite Bell inequalities designed to achieve optimal global randomness certification for an arbitrary number of outputs d. We first use symmetry arguments to argue that their maximal quantum violations certify 2log d random bits. For the first family, we construct a quantum realization using dtimes d maximally entangled states which provides a quantum violation that we conjecture to be optimal for any d. It is then numerically shown that the obtained quantum violation certifies optimal global randomness, up to numerical precision, for d=3,4. For the second family, we provide the optimal quantum violation and its quantum realization for any d, again using dtimes d maximally entangled states and projective measurements over at least two unbiased bases on one of the parties. We self-test this realization for d=3, which implies the optimal certification of two fully random trits.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present two novel families of bipartite Bell inequalities designed to achieve optimal global randomness certification for an arbitrary number of outputs d.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.