Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Systematic derivation of Tsirelson bounds in arbitrary dimensions
arXiv
Authors: Lorenzo Coccia, Matteo Padovan, Giuseppe Vallone
Year
2026
Paper ID
69941
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
98
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The study of Bell nonlocality and the bounds of quantum correlations, the so-called Tsirelson bounds, is fundamental to quantum information science and the exploration of the limits of quantum theory. While quantum bounds for qubit systems have been extensively characterized, determining tight quantum bounds for correlations attainable with high-dimensional quantum states and measurements remains a significant challenge. In this work, we propose a systematic derivation of bipartite Tsirelson and local bounds written in terms of sum-of-squares decompositions. Using this method, we discover novel bounds and recover established results for maximally entangled states of qubits and qudits.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The study of Bell nonlocality and the bounds of quantum correlations, the so-called Tsirelson bounds, is fundamental to quantum information science and the exploration of the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.