Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Foundations

Systematic derivation of Tsirelson bounds in arbitrary dimensions

arXiv
Authors: Lorenzo Coccia, Matteo Padovan, Giuseppe Vallone

Year

2026

Paper ID

69941

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

98

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The study of Bell nonlocality and the bounds of quantum correlations, the so-called Tsirelson bounds, is fundamental to quantum information science and the exploration of the limits of quantum theory. While quantum bounds for qubit systems have been extensively characterized, determining tight quantum bounds for correlations attainable with high-dimensional quantum states and measurements remains a significant challenge. In this work, we propose a systematic derivation of bipartite Tsirelson and local bounds written in terms of sum-of-squares decompositions. Using this method, we discover novel bounds and recover established results for maximally entangled states of qubits and qudits.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The study of Bell nonlocality and the bounds of quantum correlations, the so-called Tsirelson bounds, is fundamental to quantum information science and the exploration of the...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #69941 #69985 From Meta Idea to Advanced Math... #69984 Efficient and SPAM-Robust Ansat... #69955 Efficient Verification of Entan... #69953 Bell inequalities tailored to o...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.