Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Tuning Quantum MPS
arXiv
Authors: Anna Leonteva, Maxime Outteryck, Guido Masella
Year
2026
Paper ID
69862
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
170
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Matrix Product State (MPS) methods are among the most effective approaches for the classical simulation of quantum circuits, but their practical performance depends strongly on simulator hyperparameters, and default settings are often suboptimal. In this work, we propose a two-stage framework for automatic hyperparameter selection for quantum MPS simulation. In the first stage, we perform offline single-objective CMA-ES optimization under a fidelity constraint and construct a database of circuit--configuration--performance evaluations. In the second stage, we define a set of static circuit features designed to capture MPS-relevant structural properties and train a circuit-aware hybrid ranking model to recommend configurations for different quantum circuits. We evaluate the approach on multiple scalable circuit families using leave-one-family-out and size-based validation. The results show that offline optimization often improves over default settings, although the magnitude of the gain depends strongly on the backend, circuit family, and circuit scale. The learned predictor recovers a meaningful fraction of this gain, with better performance under size-based validation than under family-based transfer, but generally remains below the offline optimum.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Matrix Product State (MPS) methods are among the most effective approaches for the classical simulation of quantum circuits, but their practical performance depends strongly on...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.