Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Accuracy and precision of the estimation of the number of missing levels in chaotic spectra using long-range correlations
arXiv
Authors: I. Casal, L. Muñoz, R. A. Molina
Year
2020
Paper ID
6979
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
217
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the accuracy and precision for estimating the fraction of observed levels varphi in quantum chaotic spectra through long-range correlations. We focus on the main statistics where theoretical formulas for the fraction of missing levels have been derived, the Δ3 of Dyson and Mehta and the power spectrum of the δn statistic. We use Monte Carlo simulations of the spectra from the diagonalization of Gaussian Orthogonal Ensemble matrices with a definite number of levels randomly taken out to fit the formulas and calculate the distribution of the estimators for different sizes of the spectrum and values of varphi. A proper averaging of the power spectrum of the δn statistic needs to be performed for avoiding systematic errors in the estimation. Once the proper averaging is made the estimation of the fraction of observed levels has quite good accuracy for the two methods even for the lowest dimensions we consider d=100. However, the precision is generally better for the estimation using the power spectrum of the δn as compared to the estimation using the Δ3 statistic. This difference is clearly bigger for larger dimensions. Our results show that a careful analysis of the value of the fit in view of the ensemble distribution of the estimations is mandatory for understanding its actual significance and give a realistic error interval.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the accuracy and precision for estimating the fraction of observed levels varphi in quantum chaotic spectra through long-range correlations.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.