Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation

Bond-weighted Tensor Renormalization Group

arXiv
Authors: Daiki Adachi, Tsuyoshi Okubo, Synge Todo

Year

2020

Paper ID

6978

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

120

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We propose an improved tensor renormalization group (TRG) algorithm, the bond-weighted TRG (BTRG). In BTRG, we generalize the conventional TRG by introducing bond weights on the edges of the tensor network. We show that BTRG outperforms the conventional TRG and the higher-order tensor renormalization group with the same bond dimension, while its computation time is almost the same as that of TRG. Furthermore, BTRG can have non-trivial fixed-point tensors at an optimal hyperparameter. We demonstrate that the singular value spectrum obtained by BTRG is invariant under the renormalization procedure in the case of the two-dimensional Ising model at the critical point. This property indicates that BTRG performs the tensor contraction with high accuracy while keeping the scale-invariant structure of tensors.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We propose an improved tensor renormalization group (TRG) algorithm, the bond-weighted TRG (BTRG).

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #6978 #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78810 Secure Quantum Handshakes: Quan... #78802 Quantum Co-Design of Inhomogene... #78801 Constructing Large and Structur...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.