Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Foundations
The Transformation-Response Framework: An Operational Reformulation of Quantum Mechanics
arXiv
Authors: Meng-Jun Hu
Year
2026
Paper ID
68936
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
164
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present the transformation-response framework, an operational reformulation of quantum mechanics. A quantum state is not a Hilbert space object but the catalog of a system's responses to all physical transformations: for each operation g from the system's local group G, an interference experiment gives a complex value χ(g). The collection \{χ(g): gin G \} is the characteristic function and defines the state. The only postulate is that χ is positive-definite, encoding the requirement that no superposition of transformations yields negative probability. From this single assumption, the entire standard formalism is derived: Hilbert space via GNS construction, Born rule via Bochner theorem, Schrödinger equation from group automorphisms, and especially Feynman path integral as a Trotter limit. The framework is background-independent and time-neutral: time is a coordinate along a one-parameter subgroup of G. It also reveals a new physical constraint, product order positivity, which may lead to testable predictions. The framework provides a unified, economical, and falsifiable foundation for quantum theory rooted in operational primitives.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present the transformation-response framework, an operational reformulation of quantum mechanics.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.