Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Foundations
Improved sample complexity bound for sample-based Lindbladian simulation
arXiv
Authors: Siheon Park, Youngjin Seo, Byeongseon Go, Dhrumil Patel, Mark M. Wilde, Hyukjoon Kwon
Year
2026
Paper ID
67520
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
165
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We establish improved sample-complexity bounds for sample-based Lindbladian simulation based on the Wave Matrix Lindbladization (WML) algorithm. For a jump operator L with dimension d, we derive an explicit non-asymptotic sample complexity bound nd^*\(t,varepsilon\) le left\(frac{2d+3}{8} right\) \|L\|infty2 left\(frac{t2}{varepsilon} right\), holding for simulation time t and error varepsilon. This refines the dimension dependence of the best previously known bound, O\(d2 t2/varepsilon\), from [Go et al., Quantum Sci. Tech. 10, 045058 (2025)]. Remarkably, we show that this dimensional overhead can be entirely avoided when \| L\|infty2 = O(1/d), a condition satisfied with high probability for random Lindblad operators, yielding a typical-case sample complexity of O\(t2/varepsilon\). On the other hand, in the worst case, we show that WML necessarily requires Ω\(dt2/varepsilon\) samples by constructing an explicit example with a rank-one Lindblad operator. Our results reveal a sharp dichotomy between typical and adversarial sample complexities in Lindbladian simulation, thereby strengthening the theoretical foundations of sample-based quantum algorithms.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We establish improved sample-complexity bounds for sample-based Lindbladian simulation based on the Wave Matrix Lindbladization (WML) algorithm.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.