Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Quantum Simulation
Disentangling the sources of ionizing radiation in superconducting qubits
arXiv
Authors: L. Cardani, I. Colantoni, A. Cruciani, F. De Dominicis, G. D'Imperio, M. Laubenstein, A. Mariani, L. Pagnanini, S. Pirro, C. Tomei, N. Casali, F. Ferroni, D. Frolov, L. Gironi, A. Grassellino, M. Junker, C. Kopas, E. Lachman, C. R. H. McRae, J. Mutus, M. Nastasi, D. P. Pappas, R. Pilipenko, M. Sisti, V. Pettinacci, A. Romanenko, D. Van Zanten, M. Vignati, J. D. Withrow, N. Z. Zhelev
Year
2022
Paper ID
6528
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
104
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Radioactivity was recently discovered as a source of decoherence and correlated errors for the real-world implementation of superconducting quantum processors. In this work, we measure levels of radioactivity present in a typical laboratory environment (from muons, neutrons, and gamma's emitted by naturally occurring radioactive isotopes) and in the most commonly used materials for the assembly and operation of state-of-the-art superconducting qubits. We develop a GEANT-4 based simulation to predict the rate of impacts and the amount of energy released in a qubit chip from each of the mentioned sources. We finally propose mitigation strategies for the operation of next-generation qubits in a radio-pure environment.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Radioactivity was recently discovered as a source of decoherence and correlated errors for the real-world implementation of superconducting quantum processors.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.