Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum State Preparation Representation
Are All Events Created At-Once in Relational Quantum Mechanics?
arXiv
Authors: Pablo Toussaint
Year
2023
Paper ID
6420
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
103
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This paper discusses the possibility of temporal generation of events in relational quantum mechanics (RQM). It critically examines claims by Adlam and Rovelli that the events in RQM must have been created all-at-once in order to avoid a contradiction with the theory of relativity. The analysis demonstrates that not considering the set of events as absolute and observer-independent allows for their temporal generation. Furthermore, the paper establishes that even with the postulate of cross-perspective links, it remains possible to regard the set of events as non-absolute. Thus, events in relational quantum mechanics can be generated temporally and need not have been created all-at-once.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This paper discusses the possibility of temporal generation of events in relational quantum mechanics (RQM).
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.