Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication Related

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Simulation

Quantum Simulation of an Open System: A Dissipative 1+1D Ising Model

arXiv

Authors: Erik Gustafson, Michael Hite, Jay Hubisz, Bharath Sambasivam, Judah Unmuth-Yockey

Year

2023

Paper ID

6399

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

100

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The 1+1D Ising model is an ideal benchmark for quantum algorithms, as it is very well understood theoretically. This is true even when expanding the model to include complex coupling constants. In this work, we implement quantum algorithms designed for the simulation of open or complex coupling quantum field theories on IBM devices with a focus on the measurement of the Lee-Yang edge singularity. This feature corresponds (at large volumes) to a phase transition, and our successful reproduction of the transition represents a non-trivial test for current hardware and its ability to distinguish features of interest in quantum field theories.

Why This Paper Matters

This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
The 1+1D Ising model is an ideal benchmark for quantum algorithms, as it is very well understood theoretically.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/arXiv:2311.18728 [2] arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18728 [3] Publisher https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18728

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0

Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.