Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Machine Learning
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Local Softmax and Global Weights in Non-Boolean Event Structures
arXiv
Authors: Karl Svozil
Year
2026
Paper ID
63890
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
122
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Softmax and related normalized response functions are widely used in choice theory, machine learning, and cognitive science. In non-Boolean event structures with overlapping contexts, however, local normalization does not automatically yield a global probability weight. We show that imposing single-valuedness on shared atoms - equivalently, no-disturbance or consistent connectedness - collapses generalized softmax rules to coordinate parametrizations of the strictly positive part of the admissible-weight polytope. Any strictly positive admissible weight can be represented in this way, while boundary weights arise as limits. Exotic weights that exceed classical or quantum bounds are therefore properties of the event structure and the chosen weight, not of the normalizing link. The resulting hierarchy separates local normalization, cross-context gluing, Cauchy--Gleason linearity, and physical or cognitive realizability.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Softmax and related normalized response functions are widely used in choice theory, machine learning, and cognitive science.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.