Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Time evolution of an infinite projected entangled pair state: a neighborhood tensor update
arXiv
Authors: Jacek Dziarmaga
Year
2021
Paper ID
63230
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
175
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The simple update (SU) and full update (FU) are the two paradigmatic time evolution algorithms for a tensor network known as the infinite projected entangled pair state (iPEPS). They differ by an error measure that is either, respectively, local or takes into account full infinite tensor environment. In this paper we test an intermediate neighborhood tensor update (NTU) accounting for the nearest neighbor environment. This small environment can be contracted exactly in a parallelizable way. It provides an error measure that is Hermitian and non-negative down to machine precision. In the 2D quantum Ising model NTU is shown to yield stable unitary time evolution following a sudden quench. It also yields accurate thermal states despite correlation lengths that reach up to 20 lattice sites. The latter simulations were performed with a manifestly Hermitian purification of a thermal state. Both were performed with reduced tensors that do not include physical (and ancilla) indices. This modification naturally leads to two other schemes: a local SVD update (SVDU) and a full tensor update (FTU) being a variant of FU.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The simple update (SU) and full update (FU) are the two paradigmatic time evolution algorithms for a tensor network known as the infinite projected entangled pair state (iPEPS).
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.