!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Projective symmetry group classification of chiral mathbb{Z}2 spin liquids on the pyrochlore lattice: application to the spin-1/2 XXZ Heisenberg model
arXiv
Authors: Benedikt Schneider, Jad C. Halimeh, Matthias Punk
Year
2021
Paper ID
62824
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
147
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We give a complete classification of fully symmetric as well as chiral mathbb{Z}2 quantum spin liquids on the pyrochlore lattice using a projective symmetry group analysis of Schwinger boson mean-field states. We find 50 independent ansätze, including the 12 fully symmetric nearest-neighbor mathbb{Z}2 spin liquids that have been classified by Liu et al. [https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.075125]. For each class we specify the most general symmetry-allowed mean-field Hamiltonian. Additionally, we test the properties of a subset of the spin liquid ansätze by solving the mean-field equations for the spin-1/2 XXZ model near the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg point. We find four chiral spin liquids that break the screw symmetry of the lattice modulo time reversal symmetry. These states have a different symmetry than the previously studied monopole flux state and their unique characteristic is a fracπ{3} flux enclosed by every rhombus of the lattice.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We give a complete classification of fully symmetric as well as chiral mathbbZ2 quantum spin liquids on the pyrochlore lattice using a projective symmetry group analysis of...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.