You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Chemistry
Observable Error Bounds of the Time-splitting Scheme for Quantum-Classical Molecular Dynamics
arXiv
Authors: Di Fang, Albert Tres
Year
2021
Paper ID
62279
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
131
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum-classical molecular dynamics, as a partial classical limit of the full quantum Schrödinger equation, is a widely used framework for quantum molecular dynamics. The underlying equations are nonlinear in nature, containing a quantum part (represents the electrons) and a classical part (stands for the nuclei). An accurate simulation of the wave function typically requires a time step comparable to the rescaled Planck constant h, resulting in a formidable cost when hll 1. We prove an additive observable error bound of Schwartz observables for the proposed time-splitting schemes based on semiclassical analysis, which decreases as h becomes smaller. Furthermore, we establish a uniform-in-h observable error bound, which allows an mathcal{O}(1) time step to accurately capture the physical observable regardless of the size of h. Numerical results verify our estimates.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum-classical molecular dynamics, as a partial classical limit of the full quantum Schrödinger equation, is a widely used framework for quantum molecular dynamics.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.