Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Scaled Affine Quantization of Ultralocal varphi42 a comparative Path Integral Monte Carlo study with Canonical Quantization
arXiv
Authors: Riccardo Fantoni, John R. Klauder
Year
2021
Paper ID
61205
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
117
Citations
N/A
Abstract
After the success of affine quantization in proving through Monte Carlo analysis that the covariant euclidean scalar field theory, varphirn, where r denotes the power of the interaction term and n = s + 1 with s the spatial dimension and 1 adds imaginary time, such that r geq 2n/(n-2) can be acceptably quantized and the resulting theory is nontrivial, unlike what happens using canonical quantization, we show here that the same has to be expected for r>2 and any n even for the ultralocal field theory. In particular we consider the ultralocal varphi42 model and study its renormalized properties for both the scaled canonical quantization version and the scaled affine quantization version through path integral Monte Carlo.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- After the success of affine quantization in proving through Monte Carlo analysis that the covariant euclidean scalar field theory, varphi^rn, where r denotes the power of the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.