Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
High Dimensional Quantum Eavesdropping: A Hypothetical Attack on BB84 & SSP
arXiv
Authors: Christopher Dunne
Year
2024
Paper ID
6118
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
199
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum key distribution algorithms are considered secure because they leverage quantum phenomena to provide security. As such, eavesdroppers can be detected by analyzing the error rate in the shared key obtained by the parties performing the key exchange. Nevertheless, this paper developed and investigated a novel attack strategy capable of being undetected through error analysis of the shared key. Said attack entails an eavesdropper measuring the quantum channel (i.e., the channel used to transmit quantum particles between two parties) using a higher dimension than that used by the legitimate parties. By measuring a particle in a dimension that spans all possible states in a given quantum key distribution algorithm, the collapsed state of the measured particle should be undetectable when measured in the lower dimension. To analyze the proposed high-dimensional eavesdropping attack, the simulator Cirq was used to model the attack on BB84, a four-dimensional variant of BB84, and the Six-State Protocol. The results of these simulations show the efficiency of this attack, with an eavesdropper being undetectable through quantum bit error rate analysis in each algorithm This promotes the need for further analysis of the high-dimensional eavesdropping attack on physical hardware and other quantum key distribution algorithms
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum key distribution algorithms are considered secure because they leverage quantum phenomena to provide security.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.