Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Foundations
Measuring Accuracy and Energy-to-Solution of Quantum Fine-Tuning of Foundational AI Models
arXiv
Authors: Oliver Knitter, Sang Hyub Kim, Maximilian Wurzer, Jonathan Mei, Claudio Girotto, Karen Horovitz, Chi Chen, Masako Yamada, Frederik F. Flöther, Martin Roetteler
Year
2026
Paper ID
59980
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
159
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present an experimental study of energy-to-solution (ETS) of hybrid quantum-classical applications, enabled by direct instrumentation of power consumption of a Forte Enterprise trapped-ion quantum processor. We apply this methodology to a hybrid quantum-classical pipeline for quantum fine-tuning of foundational AI models, and validate the approach end-to-end on quantum hardware. Despite noise and limited qubit counts, the resulting models achieve accuracy competitive with and exceeding classical baselines such as logistic regression and support vector classifiers. Our results show that QPU energy consumption scales approximately linearly with qubit number for shallow circuits, while classical simulation exhibits exponential scaling, indicating a break-even for ETS around 34 qubits. The classification error improvement of the best quantum fine-tuned model over the best classical fine-tuned model considered in this study is around 24%. We further contextualize these findings with comparisons to tensor network methods. This work establishes energy-to-solution as a measurable and scalable metric for evaluating quantum applications and provides experimental evidence of favorable energy-accuracy trade-offs.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present an experimental study of energy-to-solution (ETS) of hybrid quantum-classical applications, enabled by direct instrumentation of power consumption of a Forte...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.