Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Towards a Quantum Simulation of Nonlinear Sigma Models with a Topological Term
arXiv
Authors: Jack Y. Araz, Sebastian Schenk, Michael Spannowsky
Year
2022
Paper ID
58594
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
104
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We determine the mass gap of a two-dimensional O(3) nonlinear sigma model augmented with a topological θ-term using tensor network and digital quantum algorithms. As proof of principle, we consider the example θ= π and study its critical behaviour on a quantum simulator by examining the entanglement entropy of the ground state. We confirm that the quantum theory is massless in the strong-coupling regime, in agreement with analytical results. However, we also highlight the limitations of current quantum algorithms, designed for noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, in the theory simulation at weak coupling. Finally, we compare the performance of our quantum algorithms to classical tensor network methods.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We determine the mass gap of a two-dimensional O(3) nonlinear sigma model augmented with a topological θ-term using tensor network and digital quantum algorithms.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.