Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Quantum Foundations
Anomalous energy exchanges and Wigner function negativities in a single qubit gate
arXiv
Authors: Maria Maffei, Cyril Elouard, Bruno O. Goes, Benjamin Huard, Andrew N. Jordan, Alexia Auffèves
Year
2022
Paper ID
58517
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
208
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Anomalous weak values and Wigner function's negativity are well known witnesses of quantum contextuality. We show that these effects occur when analyzing the energetics of a single qubit gate generated by a resonant coherent field traveling in a waveguide. The buildup of correlations between the qubit and the field is responsible for bounds on the gate fidelity, but also for a nontrivial energy balance recently observed in a superconducting setup. In the experimental scheme, the field is continuously monitored through heterodyne detection and then post-selected over the outcomes of a final qubit's measurement. The post-selected data can be interpreted as field's weak values and can show anomalous values in the variation of the field's energy. We model the joint system dynamics with a collision model, gaining access to the qubit-field entangled state at any time. We find an analytical expression of the quasi-probability distribution of the post-selected heterodyne signal, i.e. the conditional Husimi-Q function. The latter grants access to all the field's weak values: we use it to obtain that of the field's energy change and display its anomalous behaviour. Finally, we derive the field's conditional Wigner function and show that anomalous weak values and Wigner function's negativities arise for the same values of the gate's angle.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Anomalous weak values and Wigner function's negativity are well known witnesses of quantum contextuality.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.