Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Foundations
qSHIFT: An Adaptive Sampling Protocol for Higher-Order Quantum Simulation
arXiv
Authors: Sangjin Lee, Sangkook Choi
Year
2026
Paper ID
56623
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
162
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum simulation is a cornerstone application for quantum computing, yet standard methods face a trade-off between circuit depth and accuracy: Trotterization depth scales with the number of Hamiltonian terms L, while sampling-based qDRIFT is restricted to O\(t2\) error scaling. Here, We introduce qSHIFT, an adaptive sampling protocol that overcomes these limitations. By adaptively updating sampling distributions, qSHIFT maintains L-independent gate complexity while achieving an improved error scaling of O\(t1+r\) for an adjustable parameter r. This performance is enabled by a classical subroutine solving Lr linear equations per sampling round. Numerical demonstrations confirm the O\(t1+r\) scaling, showcasing qSHIFT as a resource-efficient framework for high-precision quantum simulation. Furthermore, the protocol's reduced circuit depth enhances its compatibility with physical error mitigation, making it a promising candidate for implementation on near-term quantum devices. In addition to its role as a standalone algorithm, qSHIFT can provide a high-precision foundation for modular quantum frameworks such as qSWIFT or Krylov quantum diagonalization.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum simulation is a cornerstone application for quantum computing, yet standard methods face a trade-off between circuit depth and accuracy: Trotterization depth scales...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.