Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Candidate Molecules for Next-Generation Searches of Hadronic Charge-Parity Violation
arXiv
Authors: Aurélien Marc, Mickaël Hubert, Timo Fleig
Year
2023
Paper ID
54635
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
94
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We systematically study a set of strongly polar heteronuclear diatomic molecules composed of laser-coolable atoms for their suitability as sensitive probes of new charge-parity violation in the hadron sector of matter. Using relativistic general-excitation-rank configuration interaction theory we single out the molecule francium-silver (FrAg) as the most promising system in this set and calculate its nuclear Schiff-moment interaction constant to WFrAgSM\(Fr\) = 30168 pm 2504a.u. for the target nucleus Fr. Our work includes the development of system-tailored atomic Gaussian basis sets for the target atom in each respective molecule.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We systematically study a set of strongly polar heteronuclear diatomic molecules composed of laser-coolable atoms for their suitability as sensitive probes of new charge-parity...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.